Scrum vs. Kanban: Selecting the Right Agile Framework for Your Project - Subscribed.FYI

Scrum vs. Kanban: Selecting the Right Agile Framework for Your Project

- Project Management

Share this article :

Share Insight

Share the comparison insight with others

Scrum vs. Kanban: Selecting the Right Agile Framework for Your Project

Understanding Agile

Agile serves as the foundation for various project management methodologies, promoting flexibility and iterative approaches. Both Scrum and Kanban, as Agile methodologies, focus on continuous improvement, collaboration, and flexibility.

Agile Manifesto

The Agile Manifesto comprises twelve guiding principles emphasizing:

  • Individuals and interactions over processes and tools
  • Working software over comprehensive documentation
  • Customer collaboration over contract negotiation
  • Responding to change over following a plan

These principles guide the practices and approaches of Scrum and Kanban.

Scrum: An Iterative Agile Framework

Scrum is an iterative, sprint-based framework designed for small teams solving complex problems and delivering high-quality products. It empowers self-organizing teams and ensures sprint goals are met.

Scrum Cadence

Scrum operates in time-boxed iterations, or sprints, lasting two to four weeks. Each sprint encourages breaking down large tasks into smaller stories and promotes rapid learning.

Scrum Roles

  1. Product Owner: Represents the customer’s interests, manages the product backlog, and prioritizes work.
  2. Scrum Master: Ensures adherence to Scrum principles and removes obstacles hindering progress.
  3. Development Team: Executes work, delivers increments, and demonstrates collective accountability.

Scrum Artifacts and Events

  • Product Backlog: Prioritized list of features, enhancements, and bug fixes.
  • Sprint Backlog: Selected items from the product backlog committed to during a sprint.
  • Sprint Planning: Meeting to identify work for the upcoming sprint.
  • Daily Scrum (Standup): Short, daily meeting for synchronization, progress reporting, and obstacle discussion.
  • Sprint Review: Meeting at sprint end to demonstrate work completed and gather stakeholder feedback.
  • Sprint Retrospective: Session for team reflection, identification of improvements, and planning for the next sprint.

Kanban: A Continuous Agile Framework

Kanban is a continuous, flow-based Agile framework focusing on visualizing work, limiting work in progress (WIP), and maximizing efficiency. It suits projects with varying priorities and sizes, offering flexibility.

Kanban Cadence

Based on continuous workflow, Kanban allows teams to remain agile and adapt to changing priorities. Work items move across columns on a Kanban board, representing stages in the development process.

Release Methodology

Kanban enables continuous delivery of working software, releasing updates as soon as they are ready, without fixed deadlines.

Kanban Roles

Kanban does not prescribe specific roles. The entire team manages the Kanban board and collaborates on tasks. Some teams may have an Agile coach for guidance.

Key Metrics

Kanban teams track lead time and cycle time to measure task movement efficiency. The Cumulative Flow Diagram (CFD) identifies bottlenecks for better throughput.

Change Philosophy

Kanban allows flexibility in the workflow, accommodating new work items or modifications based on prioritization.

Comparing Scrum and Kanban

Understanding key aspects of both frameworks helps in choosing the right one for your project.

Aspect Scrum Kanban
Cadence: Fixed-length sprints Continuous flow
Release: At the end of each sprint Continuous release
Changes: Not allowed mid-sprint Allowed at any time
Roles: Defined roles (Product Owner, Scrum Master, Development Team) No prescribed roles, entire team collaborates
Metrics: Measures progress using velocity Focuses on lead time and cycle time

Scrum and Kanban Similarities

Despite differences, Scrum and Kanban share common principles:

  • Both are based on Agile methodologies, promoting continuous improvement, collaboration, and flexibility.
  • Both focus on delivering working software early and often.
  • Both use transparency to drive process improvement and maintain team alignment.
  • Both break down complex tasks into smaller, manageable pieces.
  • Both rely on self-organizing, cross-functional teams.

When to Use Scrum

Scrum is effective for projects with well-defined feature development, long-running projects, or those with an established product backlog. It suits organizations valuing structure, commitment to sprint goals, and customer-driven development.

When to Use Kanban

Kanban is ideal for teams managing a continuous flow of requests, such as bug fixes or support tasks. It works well for projects with varying priorities and sizes, offering flexibility. Kanban suits teams valuing visualization, continuous improvement, and the ability to make changes at any time.

Combining Scrum and Kanban

Combining Scrum and Kanban, often referred to as “Scrumban”, allows teams to benefit from both frameworks. For example, a Scrum team can adopt a Kanban board for visualization and use Kanban metrics to enhance sprint planning and execution.

Choosing the Right Agile Framework

The choice between Scrum and Kanban depends on your team’s specific needs, project goals, and working style. Consider factors like team size, project complexity, flexibility, and structure when making your decision.

For more in-depth insights into Agile methodologies, you can explore the following resources:

Selecting the right Agile framework is crucial for project success, and understanding the nuances of Scrum and Kanban is the first step towards making an informed decision.

Other articles