Apify vs ZenRows – Which One is Best? Compare Features & Prices

Review

Subscribed Metric

Customer Support 4/6

Security 4/6

Ease of Use 4/6

Value of Money 4/6

Integration 5/6

Popularity 5/6

Subscribed Metric

Customer Support 5/6

Security 5/6

Ease of Use 6/6

Value of Money 5/6

Integration 4/6

Popularity 4/6

Pros & Cons

24,000+ pre-built Actors reduce development time

Managed infrastructure eliminates server setup complexity

Excellent for AI and LLM data feeds

Scalable compute units for variable workloads

Compute unit pricing can be expensive for large-scale operations

Learning curve for advanced features

API quota limitations on free tier

Pros & Cons

User-friendly API with clear docs

High success rate in bypassing bots

Responsive and helpful support

Quick integration with existing code

Higher pricing for higher volumes

Autoparsing limitations on some sites

Issues with recent pricing changes

Some sites require costly advanced plans

Other Platform Review

Data Unavailable This information for the product is not yet available. Please check back later or explore directly on product website.

Other Platform Review

Conclusion

Apify is an enterprise-grade web scraping platform offering 24,000+ pre-built Actors for data extraction and browser automation. It combines managed cloud infrastructure with API access, scheduling, and proxy management. Pricing uses compute units (memory × runtime hours). The platform excels for AI data feeds and large-scale operations. Customer support through community and professional options. Cost-effective for teams avoiding infrastructure maintenance.

Conclusion

ZenRows is a robust Web Scraping API handling rotating proxies, CAPTCHAs, and headless browsers, ideal for developers, data analysts, and startups. It offers high success rates, extensive documentation, and features such as JSON formatting, autoparsing, and usage analytics. Plans range from $69 to $2999/month, scaling for diverse needs. Compared to alternatives, ZenRows excels in ease of use and reliability but can be expensive at high volumes. Its responsive support and cost-effectiveness make it valuable for efficient scraping tasks.